Built to a standard, not to a deadline.

We do not quote from a brief. Discovery and architecture come first, because a number produced before the constraints are understood is a guess that someone pays for later. Once the architecture is agreed you get a scope and a figure against it, and changes after that are priced as changes rather than absorbed silently.

We build in two-week increments, so you see working software at the end of the second one and every two weeks after. Not a demo environment or a slide - the actual build, deployed somewhere you can use it.

Often, yes. We read the codebase before proposing anything, and a rewrite is the last recommendation rather than the first - it is usually the expensive answer to a problem that has a cheaper one. If we do think it should be rebuilt, we will show you what we found rather than assert it.

Yes. We work in your repository, to your review process, and the standards on this page apply to what we contribute whether or not they apply to the rest. Handover is continuous rather than an event at the end.

Monitoring and an on-call rotation, plus documentation written for your team rather than for us. The test of a handover is whether someone who has never met us can change the system safely, and that is what we write for.

They are measured, not estimated, and they gate the build - a release that misses one does not ship. Largest Contentful Paint and Interaction to Next Paint are what a user feels as speed and responsiveness. WCAG 2.2 AA is the accessibility level most procurement and public-sector contracts require. The coverage floor is a CI gate, not a target anyone reports on.